002 - What Do I Need?
What do I need?
No offence, but obviously you need a camera. For the sake of every dudez and chicks, I recommend that you get yourself a digital camera (no, your Sony Ericsson camera phone doesn’t count, however Cybershot it might be). You can grab one with less than USD 100 (or RM 354, <insert your currency here>).
Why? It is a LOT simpler and LOT less cash-hungry than film cameras. For the film version, you have to buy a canister of film (money), take pictures, send it to your old trusty processing lab (more money), and finally receive your pictures, only to find that half of them aren’t being the way they supposed to be (Hey, where’s Jimmy’s bride’s head?). And the wedding was a WEEK ago. Rinse, lather, repeat (again, more money).
But with the digital version, you buy a memory card ONE TIME (well, at least until it is damaged beyond repair), shoot, shoot, and shoot with all of your heart’s content, check your pictures on-the-fly, delete the ones that you don’t want, and repeat the process. Back home, you can edit them, sprinkle some creativity here and there, and only display the best of the best to everyone.
Get the picture?
You know, there are tens of different brands out there. How do I choose the best?
Frankly speaking, there are NO best brands out there. But the industry giants have excellent marketers, and all put claims that theirs are the best. Well, they should, otherwise they don’t get any sale.
The greatest misconception in digital photography history is this equation:
Higher Megapixels = Better Pictures
Ask any knowledged photographer, and they’ll shrug off the theory. And they are right to do so. Why, you might ask?
Simply put, unless you want to print every single pictures of yours in A1 size (that’s 3 times A4), you are more than good with 3 megapixels camera. A megapixel is roughly the size of picture with 1280 x 800 pixels.
Think of it as this: Why buy Ferrari with 480 km/h top speed, while the highway speed limit is only 110 km/h? (It’s my money! Why do you even care?!)
So, are you saying that Megapixels doesn’t count when buying a camera?
Megapixels DO count. However, it shouldn’t be the determining factor when buying one, unless all other factors are equal point-to-point. Let’s say that the 2 brands C and N have both the same price for a digital camera. And all other factors are completely same (battery type, apertures, frame size, optical zoom, et cetera) with only megapixels differ between the brands. I’d go for the higher one. I don’t have anything else to lose.
It NEVER hurts to have more megapixels, but it isn’t absolutely necessary to have more than you need. If you are tight on budget, a 3 or 4 megapixels will do more than good. A Nikon D2HS (a digital SLR) costs more than USD 4000, but only has 4 megapixels. It is mainly used for sport photography, where high frame per second (fps) is required, hence the name (HS - High Speed).
















Oh man, I really couldn’t agree with this post more. As an avid photographer I often get family, friends, and strangers asking me for my opinion about camera X or camera Y. Whenever I say “megapixels mean very little,” they give me the typical “yeah right, he has no idea what he’s talking about” look. Even after in depth explanation about sensor size and image quality they often are reluctant to believe me. Then I usually tell them “my camera’s only 6 megapixels.” Sometimes this shuts people up and they submit, ehh agree with me.Often times it doesn’t work and people walk away feeling that they have a one up on me because their point and shoot is 12 megapixels, oh well the proof is in the shots.
I currently shoot a Nikon D50. I wanted the D40x but soon realized that it wouldn’t accept old lenses because of it’s lack of an internal autofocus drive motor. After using a D40x briefly I can say I’m glad that I never got it because frankly I hate the layout and controls of the camera. Anyways, for the 400 I spent on my 6 megapixel DSLR I could have bought one of the new 12 megapixel PS or super-zooms, but I know I’d never be able to capture the moment with one of them so who cares how big I can blow up a crappy shot? Furthermore the size of my sensor is bigger, so that means the shots out of my 6 megapixel will be of higher quality than the 12 megpixel ps so now its official: the d50 was a great buy. Now compare the quality from a d50 and say a d3 or d300 which sport a large sensor and 12 megapixels, well then there’s no comparison, but who has an extra two to five thousand dollars hanging around? I don’t. Great post. Keep it up!
-Aaron Snyder